It passed the Legislature in the final hours of the session Saturday, but Gov. Gavin Newsom still has to sign or veto it.
Business leaders predict it would cost jobs and drive business out of state, and they warn those extra costs would be passed on to consumers.
“In a time when inflation and the cost of living are already high, the last thing California’s families need is legislation that makes everyday goods more expensive,” Paul Granillo, CEO of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, wrote in a commentary.
Environmental groups aren’t happy either. They said the bill didn’t go far enough to protect public health in neighborhoods near distribution centers, where asthma and cancer cases are linked to pollution from diesel exhaust.
The setbacks that the bill requires as buffers between warehouses and homes and schools aren’t big enough, said Ana Gonzalez, executive director of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice.
Another complaint was the way the bill passed. AB 98 is what’s called a gut-and-amend bill. That’s when lawmakers take an unrelated piece of legislation — in this case a bill about agricultural pests — and swap out all the language for a new purpose.
It’s perfectly permissible under California law, but it tends to spur complaints about cloak-and-dagger politics.
Granillo complained that AB 98 was “created in secret.” Gonzalez said she thought it wouldn’t move forward because it was so late in the game: “We feel there should have been a more holistic approach.”
Though the bill was new, its purpose has been a top priority for Eloise Gómez Reyes, the San Bernardino Democrat who co-authored the legislation. Her similar bill, AB 1000, failed in committee earlier this year, so she resurrected it with slightly scaled back restrictions.
“I think what we have put together is a common sense approach and it’s a very important first step,” she said.
|